Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Perjury...and Who Knew She Could Do Demure?


Ashley Fawn Greenhill testified today in the Felony Murder trial of Ron Wikkid Weems. A WAAY 31 news report described her as looking demure...

Making a Cocktail Waitress in a Dolly Parton Wig Look Good

Yep, we suppose she went for the demure look since she couldn't come up with a walker in jail. According to sources familiar with the case, Greenhill immediately committed perjury concerning her part in the events and especially in relating her actions in the days that followed. Why? She already has a deal.

However, the judge has not yet sentenced Greenhill. She remains on probation for other crimes, lovely baby-biter that she is. When legal pundits say only the Charles Mansons of the world get consecutive sentences, they have Ashley Greenhill in mind.

Yes, Ashley, the "demure" stripper with an axe, related she left the Weems home the day after Amanda Taylor's murder. In fact, Ashley remained with Ron until she could find a new wallet with a pe..., er, boyfriend. She even attended the Renaissance Faire with him two weeks after the murder.

*****

The defense: The truth may never be known concerning the events in the basement of Laquania Weems' Moss Street home, but there are some things we could rule out. Ever pick up a concrete block, or even half of one? Then imagine picking it up over your head and throwing it; imagine a petite woman throwing this object. We have an idea Ron Wikkid's defense isn't really trying. In the immortal words of Mark Slackmeyer: Guilty, guilty, guilty!

*****

Yesterday we mentioned the 10K check Ron and Amanda had stolen from Laurel Pruett. According to sources close to the family, the check made out to Laurel Pruett was not some state support for Pandora Pruett, but was intended to go to Laurel's middle child Nikki.

Laurel's ex-husband Ross Pruett had been granted a disability, and the 10K was court-ordered support, even though Ross' family was the primary caregiver for the disabled girl. That makes it better, doesn't it? Ron didn't come up with a scheme to steal from his own child, but from the handicapped child of one of his lovers.

*****

* Jury selection is still continuing in the Charles Moore murder trial in Moulton. The venire has now been reduced to 44.
* We'll have our report on Tuscumbia Middle School next week.
* We'll also be bringing you the "Angela Gieske Comedy Hour." Ba da Boom!



Shoalanda

9 comments:

  1. Where's theavenger? Is it only the Hunt brothers and Graham that he defends? After all, Taylor wouldn't have been killed if she hadn't been on the Weems property. Tell me, will Graham get to stay free until his appeal? Please tell me he won't.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We have an idea avenger simply doesn't like this blog due to some comments concerning an alleged rapist.

      As for Hershel Graham, we believe it depends on the length of his sentence. If 15 years or less, he can remain free on his appeal bond. Appeal could take a year or longer.

      Delete
    2. Yep, ya got me on THAT one Shoalanda! Your lies and inuendo TRIED to ruin a young man's life who was falsely accused and THAT is how I like many others discovered this piece of trash blog and grew to MORE than simply "dislike it". Of course since then, some other enterprising "bloggers" have taken up the cause to "expose" the "authors" of THIS blog! KARMA, ain't it a b*tch!

      Delete
    3. avenger, could you tell me the odds the same man would be falsely accused of three separate crimes by three separate women in two different towns?

      I also wonder why this young man left UNA if he was so innocent...

      Delete
  2. Hey Avenger, you "like" using "quotes" don't "you?" However, putting "bloggers" in quotes in reference to the writers of karma is spot on. All they "expose" is a complete lack of dignity. They are not bloggers, they are trash talking hypocrites who don't have an original thought in their sick little minds. To "avenge" a rapist, you certainly "belong" in that "group." But enough about them!

    Let's talk about you, a silly twit of a "female," who cares nothing for the women who were attacked by this "man" and will defend a beast. It's only a matter of "time" before he attacks again. Will it be you the next time?

    There's a name for women like you. Why don't you focus your "talents" on something worthwhile?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dignity? THIS blog has DIGNITY? What the blog I referenced is the EXPOSURE of the hypocrisy of the authors (I won't use "qoutes" there ARE other descriptive terms) of this trash blog. And, BTW, I am DEFINITELY not female, ask my wife! This blog is a blight on the Shoals and usually proves itself so. Spreading inuendo and gossip as fact and slanted opinion. The only bit of consolation for those who have been slandered is although some may read it they take it with for what it is. A JOKE!

      Delete
    2. Stay with the conversation, now. I was not talking about SS, just someone else's lack of any discernable dignity.

      Not a female? My bad. You sure sound like a whiney little girl defending her lover boy.

      If you think this blog is a blight and the other blog is not, then there is no hope for you.

      Delete
  3. Do you have a dictionary Shoals Inquirer? You may want to look up the meaning of HYPOCRITE. As has already been EXPOSED, Shoalanda is FULL of those who perfectly FIT the definition!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I looked it up and it said:

    hyp·o·crite [hip-uh-krit]
    noun: writers of blogs that repost what others have written, accusing others of doing exactly what they, themselves, are doing.

    ReplyDelete