From the TD:
Stutts (on anti-abortion bill), an obstetrician, said he thinks the bill is a good idea. He’s anti-abortion, and said that when he’s treating a pregnant woman, he has two patients.
Really? How about this comment from March 31, 2015?
My sole intention with Senate Bill 289 was to re-center health care decisions between a patient and her doctor by limiting government mandates.
Our deceitful representative was at one time a veterinarian. Wonder if he told clients not to spay their cats but keep them in a fenced yard?
*****
No birth control. Just tell her to stop having sex. No, we're not kidding.
*****
Our view is and always has been to counsel children on morality and self-respect. Barring that, counsel on birth control. No abortion necessary. Where are the bills on sponsoring such education in schools?
Shoalanda
No comments:
Post a Comment