Showing posts with label Shoals Racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shoals Racism. Show all posts

Friday, July 17, 2020

Tell Us What You Think!


Click to Enlarge


Above is a graphic from an ad for a Redstone Arsenal seminar. The Army isn't happy. Yet many (or should we say most) of these listed behaviors are non-productive at best.

But the point of this exercise isn't to discuss the actions of an Army agency. It's to see what our readers think about these things. 

After a brief look, we have to ask: Why is being colorblind a bad thing? What are we missing? Is Columbus Day really one the worst problems this nation has to face? Paternalism? We have news - that's not simply a racist thing. It's in every facet of our lives, and we should call out those who choose to indulge in it (listening, medical profession?).

Comments wanted and welcome on Facebook, blog, or via e-mail!



Saturday, June 20, 2020

Addressing Some Racism




We've been debating the right time to address the removal of the CSA monument currently in place at the Lauderdale County Courthouse. Ideally, it should be moved to the Florence City Cemetery or other suitable place. We do not see that happening in the immediate future due to our county commission. We welcome readers' thoughts on this problem and any solutions they may offer.

So why is now the right time to broach the subject of any form of racism? It seems our blog has been accused of being racist for calling out a white school administrator who overlooked a student's infraction. Now we're told the student is of mixed race (something we could not tell from the photograph published online).

However, we are astounded at those who made this about the young woman who received the preferential treatment and not about the admin who gave it. We're not sure if this stems from the large number of individuals who can't read with comprehension or a victim mentality that prevails much of our society.

That being said, we want to stress that we will not tolerate either readers or bloggers being called vulgar names or threatened. Simply because we allow negative comments, it doesn't follow that we allow abusive ones.

Namaste!

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Local Racism?


We're publishing a guest commentary today. We usually avoid criticism of private industries, but this particular incident should be of concern to each of us. We have redacted the name of the supervisor accused of such egregious racism:
I do not know whether this story is of interest to you or your readers. I, however, find it repulsive and hard to believe in this day in age, and I think it deserves to be known.
I have a family member who works at a company called Supreme Beverage on Avalon Avenue in Muscle Shoals. The company is a local distribution center of beer and other beverages such as Sam Adams, Miller, Coors, Red Bull, and more recently, a newly acquired account with the local brewery Singing River Brewery. 
A short time ago, the branch manager, "John Doe", was put on leave for approximately one week in the company's response to comments he made to one of his African American employees, in which he said, "When I was your age, they used to hang people like you."  These comments offended the employees and made them uncomfortable to work with Mr. Doe. The corporate offices put Mr. Doe on leave after human resources became involved. During that week, the corporate employees visited the branch, discussed the comments with the employee affected, and also witnesses to the events.
John Doe himself even admitted to making these comments in his own interview. Yet a week later, he was brought back to work, apparently with no consequences. What does that tell your employees? That racism is tolerated at this company? That they value you as a worker? Corporate employees, once Doe was brought back to work, then brought in the African American employee that had been offended and asked him, in the same room where Doe, his boss, was sitting, if he would feel uncomfortable working with Doe again. To which he replied yes, he would be uncomfortable. And yet, Doe was brought back. Giving no reason or explanation to the branch employees to the conclusions of this matter, he remains the branch manager at Supreme Beverage. A few weeks following this meeting, the employee in question called the Human Resources department, stating that he was continually uncomfortable working with Doe, yet was told Human Resources was no longer involved in the situation.
What advocate is there for the workers of this company? Will racism be tolerated, even in this day in age? I should also mention that Doe daily sells out of date beer to local stores and companies, which contributes to keeping his branch profitable. Perhaps it is the profitability of his branch that keeps Doe in good graces with corporate offices.
I found the injustice of this situation alarming, and should not be tolerated.
*****
Sadly, we don't believe this one manager or one company is alone in this type of situation. We welcome any rebuttals.
Shoalanda